Research
The Shopify A/B testing app landscape in 2026: 137 apps, 385 reviews, and what merchants actually complain about
Cem Bilen, Founder · August 1, 2026 · 12 min read
On 31 July 2026 we scraped the Shopify App Store's search for “CRO & A/B Testing”. Shopify reported 1,229 results. We walked 25 search pages, collected 599 app cards, deep-scraped 137 of them — listing, plans, rating distribution, reviews — and read 385 reviews in full.
The point was competitive research for our own product. What came back was more useful than a competitor grid: a picture of a category that looks saturated and is not, that is younger than it appears, and whose customers punish something quite different from what its vendors optimise for.
Everything below is arithmetic on public listing data. The aggregate tables ship as a downloadable file at the end of this post, so you can check the numbers rather than take them.
How this was collected, and what it cannot tell you
Method first, because a finding without its limits is a marketing claim wearing a lab coat.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Source | Shopify App Store search, “CRO & A/B Testing” |
| Date | 31 July 2026 |
| Results Shopify reported | 1,229 |
| Search pages walked | 25 (24 cards per page) |
| App cards collected | 599 |
| Apps deep-scraped | 137 |
| Reviews read | 385 (312 positive, 73 negative or neutral) |
What we do not know, stated plainly
- Shopify does not publish install counts. Review count is the only proxy available and it systematically understates real usage — most happy merchants never review anything.
- Market share, revenue and growth rate cannot be derived from this data, and have not been. Any number in this post that looks like traction is a review count, not a customer count.
- 599 of the 1,229 reported results were collected. We sampled the tail and stopped when it turned into address validators and stock counters. That cut is our editorial decision, not Shopify's.
- The tiering below (core / enterprise / adjacent / noise) is our editorial call. Shopify does not categorise the category this way.
- Per-app strengths and weaknesses were derived from at most six positive and six negative reviews per app. For the leaders that is close to every review at three stars or below; for an app with four reviews it has no statistical value and is not presented as if it does.
The shape of the category
Of the 599 cards collected, 137 were worth reading in full. Sorting those by what they actually are:
| Tier | What it means | Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Core | A dedicated A/B testing or experimentation product built for Shopify | 61 |
| Enterprise | A multi-platform CRO or experimentation suite that also ships a Shopify app | 13 |
| Adjacent | CRO tooling that is not experimentation — popups, upsell, badges, page builders, audits, analytics | 57 |
| Noise | Caught by the search, unrelated to the category | 6 |
The 61-app core set is the real category, and it is what the rest of this post is about. The 13 enterprise listings are a separate phenomenon worth naming: AB Tasty, Kameleoon, Dynamic Yield, Intellimize and Omniconvert all have Shopify listings, and almost none of them have reviews. That is presence, not traction — those companies sell through a sales team, and the App Store listing is a connector, not a storefront.
Crowded is not the same as competitive
A merchant searching this category sees hundreds of results and concludes it is a solved, saturated market. The review distribution says otherwise.
Of the 61 core apps, 28 have no reviews at all. Fifteen have ten or more. Five have fifty or more. Four have a hundred or more. Across the whole core set there are 856 reviews, and 61% of them belong to four names: Intelligems (161), Elevate (127), Visually (120) and Shoplift (117).
Being listed on the App Store is a shelf, not distribution. Two thirds of this category is on the shelf and nobody has picked it up.
| App | Rating | Reviews | 1–2★ | Entry | Top plan | Launched |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligems | 4.8 | 161 | 3.7% | $69 | $349 | Dec 2021 |
| Elevate | 4.9 | 127 | 2.4% | $49 | $499 | Dec 2020 |
| Visually | 4.7 | 120 | 5.0% | Free | $80 | Jun 2022 |
| Shoplift | 4.9 | 117 | 3.4% | $99 | $999 | Sep 2022 |
| ABConvert | 4.7 | 72 | 4.2% | $99 | $599 | Oct 2022 |
| Shogun | 4.2 | 39 | 12.8% | $39 | $499 | Mar 2025 |
| ABsolutely | 5.0 | 32 | 0.0% | $49 | $499 | Nov 2024 |
| Essential CRO | 5.0 | 24 | 0.0% | — | — | Jun 2025 |
| ABboost | 4.4 | 22 | 13.6% | $4.99 | $29.99 | Nov 2025 |
| GemX | 4.7 | 19 | 5.3% | $49 | $99 | Sep 2024 |
The fifteen apps with enough reviews to judge, and what each one is for
Twenty-eight of the 61 core apps have no reviews at all, so most of this category cannot be assessed from outside it. Fifteen have ten or more — the point where a rating starts to carry information and still does not carry much. That set is below, with what each app is built to test.
Every figure is a public listing fact as of 31 July 2026. Vendors move ratings, plans and prices; the table exists to be checkable, not to be permanently current. “Entry” and “Top” are the lowest and highest listed monthly plan, and nearly every plan in this category also scales with order or visitor volume, so both numbers are floors.
| Intelligems | 4.8 | 161 | $69 | $349 | Yes | Dec 2021 |
| Elevate | 4.9 | 127 | $49 | $499 | Yes | Dec 2020 |
| Visually | 4.7 | 120 | Free | $80 | No | Jun 2022 |
| Shoplift | 4.9 | 117 | $99 | $999 | No | Sep 2022 |
| ABConvert | 4.7 | 72 | $99 | $599 | Yes | Oct 2022 |
| Shogun | 4.2 | 39 | $39 | $499 | Yes | Mar 2025 |
| ABsolutely | 5.0 | 32 | $49 | $499 | Yes | Nov 2024 |
| Essential CRO | 5.0 | 24 | — | — | Yes | Jun 2025 |
| ABboost | 4.4 | 22 | $4.99 | $29.99 | Yes | Nov 2025 |
| GemX | 4.7 | 19 | $49 | $99 | No | Sep 2024 |
| Eraya | 5.0 | 19 | Free | $59 | Yes | Oct 2025 |
| CustomFit AI | 5.0 | 19 | Free | $139 | No | May 2023 |
| Split | 2.8 | 13 | Free | $10 | Yes | Dec 2024 |
| A/B: Product and Price Testing | 3.2 | 11 | Free | $49.99 | Yes | Aug 2021 |
| Theme Scientist | 3.5 | 10 | $9.99 | $29.99 | No | Mar 2020 |
Price, shipping and margin
The largest group, and the one that separates this category from web A/B testing generally. Ten of the fifteen test a commercial variable rather than a piece of a page.
- Intelligems — the widest test surface in the set: price, shipping, content, checkout and post-purchase, reported on profit per visitor rather than raw conversion rate. Most reviews of any app here and the most enterprise-leaning shape.
- Elevate — a price and shipping specialist, listed since December 2020, carrying 4.9★ over 127 reviews with 2.4% of them at one or two stars. That is the cleanest published distribution at that volume in the set.
- ABConvert — price, shipping, theme and URL testing from $99, the same entry anchor as Shoplift. What differs is the meter: you are billed on test orders rather than on site traffic, with 1,000 included on Starter and $59 per additional thousand, falling to $24 per thousand on the $599 Pro plan. It competes on how you are billed, not on being cheap.
- ABsolutely — price, shipping, theme and template testing; 5.0★ across 32 reviews, which is a small enough base that it says more about early customers than about the product.
- Eraya — a free plan and a $59 ceiling, listed October 2025. Too new to judge on 19 reviews, and priced to be tried.
Theme and template
Swapping a whole theme or template against another. This is the capability a snippet cannot reach — it needs to work inside the theme — and it is also the capability merchants write about least: one positive review in 312 names it.
- Shoplift — tests are built inside Shopify's theme customizer, results read Bayesian, and Lift Assist auto-creates experiments. Priced per monthly unique visitor, with the highest listed ceiling in the set at $999.
- Essential CRO — theme and template split testing, listed June 2025, 5.0★ over 24 reviews and no plan prices published on the listing we read.
- Shogun — pages, themes, templates and price testing, backed by an established page-builder brand, and carrying the weakest rating of the funded cohort: 4.2★ with 12.8% of reviews at one or two stars. Distribution on its own does not carry a testing product.
- Theme Scientist — the oldest listing in the set (March 2020) and the cheapest theme tester at $9.99, at 3.5★ over 10 reviews.
Content and layout, without a developer
The group closest to what Looplift does, and the group whose praise is the most uniform: install it, change the page, no developer.
- Visually — a no-code visual editor bundled with personalisation, recommendations and upsells; free on development stores and metered by order volume above that. Client-side visual editing is both its reach and its exposure.
- GemX — page and funnel optimisation at $49–$99, listed September 2024.
- CustomFit AI — no-code personalisation plus testing, free on development stores and priced by monthly visitors from $79.
The cheap end, and the cautionary end
Three listings are worth naming for what they demonstrate rather than what they sell.
- ABboost — $4.99 to $29.99, the lowest ceiling in the set, listed November 2025.
- Split — 2.8★ over 13 reviews, with 38% of them at one or two stars: the clearest published example in this category of price testing going wrong on a live store.
- A/B: Product and Price Testing — 3.2★ over 11 reviews, the same lesson from a different vendor. Merchants say so publicly when a test touches money and misfires, which is the strongest argument in this dataset for keeping commercial variables out of a testing tool's reach.
Two things to take from the shape rather than the rows. Ten of the fifteen test price or shipping, which means the category's centre of gravity is server-side commerce logic, not storefront presentation. And a rating here is not a usage count: Shopify publishes no install figures, so a 5.0★ over 19 reviews and a 4.8★ over 161 are not the same evidence, and neither is evidence of market share.
Looplift is not in this table. It is not listed on the Shopify App Store, so it has no rating, no review count and no badge — which is the honest position to be in while publishing a table like this one.
The category is about two years old
Sorted by launch date, the core set is not a mature market being defended. It is a market being written.
| Launch year | Core apps |
|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 |
| 2020 | 2 |
| 2021 | 2 |
| 2022 | 4 |
| 2023 | 7 |
| 2024 | 8 |
| 2025 | 18 |
| 2026 | 19 |
Thirty-seven of the 61 core apps — 61% — launched in 2025 or 2026. The oldest app with real traction shipped in December 2020. Whatever conventions this category appears to have, they were set in the last twenty-four months by a handful of teams, and most of them are still being argued about.
What merchants punish
This is the part we did not expect. We coded all 73 reviews rated three stars or below by theme. Percentages are of that 73.
| Complaint | Reviews | Share of 73 |
|---|---|---|
| Bugs / the app does not work | 13 | 18% |
| Pricing or billing | 11 | 15% |
| Support did not respond | 7 | 10% |
| Code left behind after uninstall | 5 | 7% |
| Broke the store or the theme | 4 | 5% |
| Capability too limited | 2 | 3% |
| Data or statistics not trustworthy | 1 | 1% |
| Flicker or page speed | 1 | 1% |
Flicker — the flash of original content before a variant is applied — is the thing this category's marketing argues about. Every serious vendor benchmarks it. It accounts for one review out of 73.
Meanwhile, code left behind after uninstall (7%) plus breaking the store or theme (5%) is 12% of everything merchants complain about: roughly one negative review in eight is about a testing app changing something it should not have, and then not being removable. Add “the app does not work” at 18% and you have a category whose reputational risk is reliability, not milliseconds.
One de-identified example, because the tone matters more than the arithmetic: a two-star review of a Built-for-Shopify app, written twenty minutes after install, reports five blocks of code still on the page after uninstalling. Twenty minutes. That merchant will never install another testing app without checking first.
What merchants praise
The positive side is more uniform, and it should deflate anyone planning to compete on it.
| Praise | Reviews (of 312) |
|---|---|
| Easy install, no developer needed | 72 |
| Trusts the statistics | 24 |
| Measurable revenue impact | 23 |
| Support quality | 20 |
| Price or shipping testing | 6 |
| Theme or template testing | 1 |
Seventy-two of 312 positive reviews are some version of “installed in minutes, did not need a developer.” That is the single most repeated sentence in this category's praise, and it means one-click install is table stakes. The leaders solved it years ago. Any product entering now that treats “no developer required” as its differentiator is selling a feature its competitors already gave away.
The other number worth sitting with: theme and template testing — the deepest, most-marketed capability in the category — is named in exactly one positive review out of 312. Merchants are not writing home about test surface area.
The strategy layer is a person, and it costs $349 to $999
Every leader's top plan contains the same items, and they are not software.
| App | Top plan | What is in it |
|---|---|---|
| Shoplift | $999/mo | Dedicated merchant success manager, twice-monthly strategy sessions, storefront audit and testing roadmap, Slack channel, quarterly business review |
| ABConvert | $599/mo | White-glove onboarding, dedicated account manager, dedicated Slack channel |
| Elevate | $499/mo | Dedicated account manager, personalised testing roadmap, white-glove onboarding, priority Slack support |
| ABsolutely | $499/mo | Dedicated strategy manager and roadmap, Slack channel support |
| Intelligems | $349/mo | Storefront audit and roadmap, white-glove onboarding, dedicated customer success manager |
The serious entry anchor sits at $49–$99: Shoplift, Intelligems, Elevate, ABsolutely, GemX and ABConvert all start there. Forty-nine percent of the core set has a free plan, which makes free an entry ticket rather than a position. And nearly every plan in the category scales with order or visitor volume, so the price on the listing is a floor, not a bill.
Read the two facts together and the category's economics are legible: the software is priced at $49–$99, and the expensive part — deciding what to test and in what order — is billed as a human being at the top of the ladder.
One more empty box: nobody claims to learn
We also read the listing text, feature lists and plan descriptions of all 74 core and enterprise apps looking for specific claims. The word “hypothesis” appears in zero of them. One app claims to get better from past tests. Three claim to recommend what to test next — and the strongest of those sells it in a $69 entry plan, so “we tell you what to test” is neither novel nor expensive.
It is tempting to read an empty corridor as an opportunity nobody noticed. The more likely reading is less flattering: the claim is absent because proving it is hard. We take that as a warning about our own marketing rather than an invitation.
The AI-native wave is arriving right now
One more pattern, offered as an observation rather than a prediction. A cluster of apps telling an explicitly AI-first story has entered this category in the last eighteen months, and none of them has traction yet.
| App | Launched | Reviews | What the listing claims |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curvature AI Price Testing | Jan 2023 | 7 | Increase profit by testing prices without complex A/B tests |
| Spar: AI CRO & A/B Testing | Apr 2025 | 4 | AI CRO identifies UX gaps, designs and creates A/B tests |
| Eevy AI: A/B Testing Autopilot | Nov 2025 | 1 | Self-optimizing conversion rate optimization |
| Insighter AI A/B Testing & CRO | Jan 2026 | 2 | Optimize your storefront with AI insights, CRO and A/B testing |
| AutoGrow: AI A/B Test Autopilot | May 2026 | 0 | Storefront A/B tests created, run and reviewed for you |
| Convertify: AI A/B Testing | Jun 2026 | 0 | Build tests with AI and pick winners on profit, not revenue |
Zero to seven reviews each. The window is open and it is closing: six apps are currently telling a version of the same story, and the first one to accumulate real reviews will define what merchants expect the story to mean. We are one of the apps in that corridor, which is exactly why we would rather publish the category's actual failure data than another paragraph about AI.
Tools people name that are not App Store apps
Four names come up constantly in Shopify testing conversations and are not in the category listing at all. That matters more than it sounds: a roundup assembled from the App Store grid will never mention them, and a merchant who only reads those roundups will never hear about a platform that might suit them better.
It cuts the other way too. These are general web experimentation platforms with a Shopify integration, not Shopify-native tools, so the install path, the pricing shape and the support model are all different. Facts below are from each vendor’s own pricing page, read 2 August 2026.
- Convert — Growth at $399/month, Pro at $599/month, both discounted on annual billing, Enterprise on request. It meters Monthly Tested Users, with 100K included on Growth and Pro, and offers a 15-day trial with no card. A script on your site, not an app.
- VWO — Growth, Pro and Enterprise tiers with no prices published on the pricing page, and a free exploration option. Web, mobile-app and server-side testing with SDKs in more than ten languages. This is an experimentation platform that happens to work on Shopify.
- Mida — a general tool that works anywhere you can add custom HTML, Shopify included, alongside WordPress, Webflow, WooCommerce and Wix. Its pitch is a light script, quoted on its own site at 15 KB compressed and roughly 20 ms to load. A free plan exists; prices are not published.
- Permar — we could not reach its own site to verify anything (the TLS handshake failed on 2 August 2026), and third-party listings describe it as an AI landing-page builder rather than a testing tool. We are not going to characterise it from secondhand sources. Check it yourself if it is on your list.
And the one that is not a product at all: Shopify’s own Rollouts, shipped in the Winter ’26 edition. Rollouts are available from the Basic plan and experiments from Grow, the unit is your main theme plus checkout and accounts configuration, headless storefronts are not supported, and there is no public API. For a whole-theme split it is free and it is the best-placed implementation there is. It is the first thing to rule in or out before you buy anything in the table above.
What we changed because of this
We were building toward a speed and intelligence story. The reviews say the thing that gets an app deleted and publicly written about is breaking a store and leaving code behind, so we moved the promise: the first sentence of our product is now about not touching your theme, and the intelligence is the second sentence.
That is the whole editorial change, and we are not going to dress it up as more. The mechanical reason some apps can promise a clean uninstall and others cannot is a longer story, and it is the next post.
Check the numbers
Aggregate figures from a scrape of the Shopify App Store's CRO & A/B Testing category on 31 July 2026: method and limits, tier counts, review distribution, launch years, coded complaint and praise themes, listing-claim counts, and public listing facts for all fifteen apps carrying ten or more reviews. Verbatim reviews are deliberately excluded.
Sources
This table cannot tell you what to change on your store
It is public listing data: what each app is built to test, and nothing about your storefront. A Looplift audit reads the pages you actually sell on and returns three changes worth testing, each with the evidence behind it and the variant already built against your page. It is free and nothing goes live without your approval. If all three are things you had already thought of, your bottleneck is execution rather than ideas — go back to the table and buy one of the fifteen.
Run the free audit